Petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners requested leave to withdraw the petitions at the initial hearing. The court disposed of the matter by dismissing the petitions as withdrawn. There are no substantive legal issues adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR
WRIT PETITION NOS.109247-48/2017 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
(BY SRI. RAKESH S. HATTIKATAGI & SATISH M. S., ADVS.)
AND:
: 2 :
(BY SRI. K L PATIL & P S TADAPATRI, ADVS.)
: 3 :
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO:
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
A memo has been preferred by the learned counsel
for the petitioners praying leave of this Court to withdraw the petitions.
Memo is placed on record.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
gab
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri. Venakanagouda S/o Yallapagouda
Yallappagouda S/o Bapagouda
Nethajigouda S/o Tammanagouda
Shivanagouda S/o Venkanagouda
Yallawwa W/o Appannagouda
Janaki Ishwargouda Patil
G. Narenda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
