The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous since the underlying O.S. No. 1/2017 was disposed of by the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION NO.107192/2019 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
PETITIONER NO.5 BEING MINOR IS REPTD. BY 1ST PETITIONER.
...PETITIONERS
2
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
...RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28.08.2017 PASSED BY SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G IN O.S.NO.1/2017 ON I.A.NO.18.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
The petitioner has filed a memo and states that O.S.No.1/2017 has been disposed off by the Trial Court and hence, the petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the memo and the submission made, the petition has been dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
*Svh/-
Hari S/o Mallappa Naik and others
Geeta Alias Laxmibai Appaji and others
S. Sunil Dutt Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
