A writ petition challenging an interim order was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying civil suit had been disposed of and closed by the trial court on 05/04/2019.
This writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION NO.104893 OF 2016 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHAREDDY SAHUKAR, ADV.)
AND
2
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.R H ANGADI FOR R2 & R4 )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED: 15.09.2015 ON IA.NO.2 IN OS.NO.196/2014 PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SIRUGUPPA, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-E, AND ALLOW THE I.A.NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-D.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Registry was directed to ascertain as to whether
the suit out of which this writ petition arises has been disposed off or not.
3
No.196/2014 has been disposed and closed by order dated 05/04/2019.
been rendered infructuous and is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
SD/JUDGE
Hmb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition needs to be disposed of when the underlying suit has been closed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. Nagalingappa
Sri. Mareppa
Sri. Gadeppa
Smt. Basamma
Sri. Ravi
Smt. Hanumantamma
S. Sunil Dutt Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
