A bench of the High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ appeal cross objection after learning that the appellant filed a request to withdraw the pending appeal. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BELLUNKE A.S.
WRIT APPEAL CROB. No.100001/2018 (S-RES)
BETWEEN
SMT. GANGAVVA W/O GURUSIDDAPPA ICHANGI, (BEFORE MARRIAGE GANGAMMA SHIVAPPA ULLAGADDI), AGED ABOUT: 25 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/AT: KOTTIGERI, NEAR POLICE STATION, BANKAPUR, TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI.
….. CROSS OBJECTOR
(BY SRI MRUTYUNJAY TATA BANGI, ADV.)
AND
2
WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI.
..... RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT APPEAL CROB IS FILED U/O.41 RULE 33 OF CPC R/W.SEC.4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, R/W. ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO, READ DOWN THE ORDER BY CONSIDERING THE OBJECTIONS OF THE CROSSOBJECTOR AGAISNT THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT PASSED IN WP.NO.108933 OF 2O17 DATED:06.02.2018, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS WRIT APPEAL CROB. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the cross objector submits that permission may be accorded to withdraw the writ appeal cross objection.
3
3. In the circumstances, writ appeal cross
objection is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
Naa
Smt. Gangavva
The State of Karnataka
The Deputy Director, Women and Child Welfare Department
Smt. Umamaheshwar Basangoouda Patil
B.V. Nagarathna
Bellunke A.S.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
