The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by Sri. B.T. Sridhar Prasad under Section 96 of CPC against a judgment and decree dated 28.06.2012 in O.S. 3091/2007, as the appellant failed to appear and the appeal against respondents 3 and 6 was previously dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
R.F.A.NO.1666/2012(PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI. B.T. SRIDHAR PRASAD S/O LATE K.H. THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS RESIDING C/O SHOBHARANI NEXT SRINIVASA AND PADVATHI KALYANA MANTAPA, ARCHAKARA HALLI VILLAGE, RAMANAGAR TOWN RAMANAGAR.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. B.T. SRIDHAR PRASAD – APPELLANT-ABSENT)
AND:
2
3 . SMT. B.T. VISHALAKSHI W/O H.V. MURTHY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT NO.A-202 SAMRAT APRTMENTS, EAST AND D MAIN ROAD, 9TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 069. 4 . SMT. B.T. GEETHA W/O UDAYKUMAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.239, 7TH CROSS NEAR WATER TANK BCC LAYOUT, BANGALORE – 560 040. 5 . SM. VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O SRI. GURURAJ AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.2915, 14TH MAIN ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 040. 6 . SMT. PUTTATHAYAMMA W/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT NO.943, NEW NO.71 3RD MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 040.
…RESPONDENTS
(R-1, R-2, R-4 AND R-5 ARE SERVED)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AN DECREE DATED:28.06.2012 PASSED IN O.S.3091/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE XVIII-ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ARAVIND KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
JUDGMENT
Appellant- Sri.B.T.Sridhar Prasad called out.
None appears.
Proceedings of this appeal would indicate that appeal has been dismissed against respondent Nos.3 and 6 on 05.02.2018. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for default.
SD/JUDGE
SD/JUDGE
DR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. B.T. Sridhar Prasad
Smt. B.T. Manjula
Smt. B.T. Bramaramba
Smt. B.T. Vishalakshi
Smt. B.T. Geetha
SM. Vijayalakshmi
Aravind Kumar
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
