High Court at Bengaluru disposed of a miscellaneous first appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking enhancement of compensation. The appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4459 2018
APPELLANTS
BENGALURU – 560 097.
(By Sri. RAJENDRA V.G., Advocate)
-V/S-
RESPONDENTS
BENGALURU – 560 097.
MFA. No. 4459/2018
2
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 173(1) OF MV
ACT against the Judgment and Award dated 23.08.2017, passed in MVC No.93/2016, on the file of the ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MACT, UDUPI, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
3
MFA. No. 4459/2018
O R D E R
Three weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed on its own.
Sd/JUDGE
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt. 03.09.2019, Office objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
T By: UN
R By: DS COPY C By: TS
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Hemavathi
Ramesh Kunder
Mrs. Dhanya Sanker
The ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Mr. Balaram Rao
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
