Appellants withdrew the Second Appeal against a Land Acquisition compensation order pursuant to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court dismissed the appeal
liberty to prefer a fresh appeal on the point of pecuniary jurisdiction before the District Court
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
MFA No.101229/2017 (LAC)
BETWEEN :
. ….APPELLANTS
(By Sri.: V.S. KALASURMATH, HCGP)
AND ;
... RESPONDENTS
2
MFA FILED U/SEC. 54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 20.11.2015 PASSED IN LAC. NO.28/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, DHARWAD, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.12,519/PER GUNTA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned HCGP filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal seeking permission to prefer the appeal before the District Court on the point of pecuniary jurisdiction.
The submission is placed on record. The learned HCGP is permitted to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by granting liberty as prayed for.
MNS/
Sd/JUDGE
The Land Acquisition Officer and Assistant Commissioner
The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division, Dharwad
The Government of Karnataka
Ningappa S/O. Shiddappa Kuri
Basappa S/O. Shiddappa Kuri
Shivanand S/O. Shiddappa Kuri
K. Natarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
