Single Judge of Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench dismissed RSA 100818/2016 on 14/06/2017 as belated compliance with office objection was not made by the appellant's advocate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS 8TH DAY OF MARCH, 2017
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR RSA NO 100818 OF 2016
BETWEEN
TAL: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
... APPELLANTS
(By Sri./Smt : CHANDRASHEKHAR M HOSAMANI)
2
AND
1A) SMT.LAXMAWWA W/O IRAPPA NAIKAR, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O: GODACHI, TAL: RAMDURG, DIST: BELAGAVI.
S/O DODDAGADIGANAIK PATIL @ NAIKAR, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BASARAGI INAM VILLAGE,
TAL: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
2B) SHRI.BHIMAPPA
AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BASARAGI INAM VILLAGE,
TAL: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: BASARAGI INAM VILLAGE,
3
3B) SMT.LAXAMAVVA W/O HANAMANTAPPA MAHIMANNAVAR, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: CHIPPALAKATTI, TAL: RAMDURG, DIST: BELAGAVI. 3C) SRI.NINGANAIK S/O HANAMANAIK PATIL @ NAIKAR, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BASARAGI INAM VILLAGE, TAL: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
3D) SRI.SANNANINGNAIK S/O HANAMANAIK PATIL @ NAIKAR, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BASARAGI INAM VILLAGE, TAL: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
3E) SRI.BASAPPA S/O HANAMANAIK PATIL @ NAIKAR, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BASARAGI INAM VILLAGE, TAL: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
3F) SRI.VITTAL S/O HANAMANAIK PATIL @ NAIKAR, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BASARAGI INAM VILLAGE, TAL: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
4
... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri./Smt : null)
This RSA filed U/S.100 of CPC, 1908, against the Judgement & Decree dtd:12.07.2016 passed in R.A.NO. 13/2011 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Saundatti, dismissing the appeal, confirming and uphelding the Judgment and Decree dtd: 04.08.2010, passed in FDP.NO. 31/1994 on the file of the Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class Saundatti.
5
This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Court delivered the following:
O R D E R
Again one week time is granted for complying with the office objections, or otherwise the appeal will stand dismissed automatically. There is no need to place the appeal before the Court for passing orders on dismissal.
SD/JUDGE
NOTE: As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 14/06/2017, the advocate for the appellants has not complied with the office objection. Hence, this RSA No.100818/2016 stands dismissed as per the Court order dtd: 08/03/2017.
BY ORDER
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
R- By:C- By:T- BY:- afh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
AJJAPPA A/F DODDANINGANAIK PATIL @ NAIKAR SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
SANNAGADIGEPPA HANAMANAIK PATIL @ NAIKAR
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
