Sri.Dastagirsab v. Smt.Hasimbi
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS…
COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS 8TH DAY OF MARCH, 2017
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
RSA NO 100814 OF 2016
BETWEEN
SRI.DASTAGIRSAB S/O ABDULKHADAR MULLA, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: BARBINDING, R/O: WARD NO.7, ILAKAL, TALUK: HUNUGUND, DIST: BAGALKOTE.
... APPELLANT
(By Sri./Smt : AMEERAHMED H BAGALI & A.A.SHABASHKAN)
AND
SMT.HASIMBI W/O GANISAB KALBURGI, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: BADAMI, NEAR PETROL PUMP, GULEDGUDDA ROAD, BADAMI, TALUK: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOTE.
…RESPONDENT
(By Sri./Smt: null)
This RSA filed U/S 100 R/W order XLII rule 1 of CPC, 1908, against the Judgement & Decree dtd: 08.09.2016 passed in R.A.NO. 22/2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Hungund, allowing the appeal and setting aside the Judgment and Decree dtd: 03.10.2013, passed in O.S. NO. 175/2008 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Hungund.
2
O R D E R
Again one week time is granted for complying with the office objections, or otherwise the appeal will stand dismissed automatically. There is no need to place the appeal before the Court for passing orders on dismissal.
NOTE : As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 14/06/2017, the advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objection. Hence, this RSA No.100814/2016 stands dismissed as per the Court order dtd: 08/03/2017.
BY ORDER
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
R- By:C- By:T- BY:- afh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI.DASTAGIRSAB S/O ABDULKHADAR MULLA
SMT.HASIMBI W/O GANISAB KALBURGI
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court