First Appeal dismissed as not pressed. The appellant filed a memo seeking dismissal of the appeal due to settlement with the respondent before the Trial Court, and the court granted this request without delving into merits.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAO
MFA NO.201295/2016 (F.C)
Between: Smt. Vedanti W/o Rohit Barshi, Age: 27 years, Occ: Household work, R/o: C/o: B-10 Praid estate, Aashar estate, Opp. Upanagar Naka, Nashik-6 Maharashtra State.
… Appellant
(By Sri Shivashankar H.Manur, Advocate)
And: Sri Rhohit S/o Jayaraj Barshi, Age: 29 years, Occ: Nil, R/o: J.M.Road, Opp. Darbar House, Gujjar Galli, Vijaypur-586101.
… Respondent
(By Sri.Sanganabasava. B.Patil, Advocate)
2
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 28(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, R/w Sec.19(1) of Family Courts Act, 1984, praying (a) Call for records pertaining to the judgment and order dated 14.09.2015 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Vijaypur, in M.C.No.153/2015, (b) Set-aside the judgment and order dated 14.09.2015 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Vijaypur, in M.C.No.153/2015.
This appeal coming on for orders this day, RATHNAKALA J., delivered the following:
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 28.11.2017, which reads thus :-
“Memo Regd. Not Pressed
Herein, the appellant most respectfully submits as under:
That the appellant and respondent have settled their dispute before the Trial Court as such the above appeal does not survive for consideration. As such the appellant is seeking not press of the above appeal.
Wherefore, it is prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to dismiss the
3
above appeal as not press, in the interest of justice and equity”.
In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed as
not pressed.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
sn/SMP
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Vedanti W/o Rohit Barshi
Sri Rhohit S/o Jayaraj Barshi
Rathnakala
N.K.Sudhindrarao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
