The Karnataka High Court dismissed Criminal Petition No. 666 of 2016 as infructuous because a related Criminal Petition No. 1999 of 2016 had been allowed in the same proceedings, rendering the present petition unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.666 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
Shri C.P. Gangadhareshwara, Son of Puttamadegowda, Aged 49 years, No.367, 1st “E” Cross, 7th Block, Banashankari 3rd State, Bangalore – 560 079.
…PETITIONER
(By Shri Kiran S. Javali, Advocate)
AND:
The Income Tax Department, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1(4), C.R.Buildings, Bangalore – 560 001. By Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik. …RESPONDENT
2
(By Shri Jeevan Neeralagi, Advocate)
This Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set aside the order dated 21.10.2015 in C.C.No.37/2012 on the file of the Special Court (Economic Offences) Bangalore and allow the application filed under Section 91 read with Section 243(2) of Cr.P.C.
This Criminal Petition coming on for Admission this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R
In view of the petition in Crl.P.1999/2016 having been
allowed, the corresponding petition, namely Crl.P.666/2016 is
rendered infructuous.
Hence, the present petition is dismissed. I.A.1/2016 is
disposed of as a consequence.
Sd/- JUDGE
KS
Shri C.P. Gangadhareshwara
The Income Tax Department
ANAND BYRAREDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
