it is a natural and unprovoked revelation of what actually transpired. Given the manner in which it is narrated, it is difficult to fathom that the girl was dull-witted. In any event, this was a case involving possible rape and though the entire case was framed as if it was a mere case of molestation or a case of attempt to commit rape, the fact that the victim has come before the court and has candidly narrated the manner in which the incident has occurred would, in the opinion of this court, throw the procedure and the form in which the victim’s case is to be addressed to the winds, especially, when it is a rape victim who is narrating her plight and trauma before the court. In any event, the cross-examination has caused a severe dent in the statements made in her evidence if we are to strictly apply the criminal jurisprudence, this would be the inevitable conclusion. However, the court below having proceeded to hold that on the basis of the evidence of other witnesses, if at least a case of an attempt to rape is made out, even if there was no medical evidence of rape of having been committed, given
