High Court of Karnataka Commission allowed six weeks to petitioners to comply with missing office objections, failing which the writ petition was subsequently dismissed.
Petition dismissed automatically for non-compliance with the order to submit office objections within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
DATED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN
WP NO 105641 OF 2015 [S-PRO]
BETWEEN
2
| 5. | SHRI. SHIVANAND MADIWALAYYA HIREMATH AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: SENIOR HEALTH INSPECTOR NOW WORKING AS CHIEF OFFICER, TP KONNUR, TQ:GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI |
|---|---|
| 6. | SHRI. VITTAL S. LATNI AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: REVENUE OFFICER NOW WORKING AS CHIEF OFFICER, TMC SADALAGA, TQ: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI |
| 7. | SHRI. KUMAR SHIVAJI KOLI AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: SENIOR HEALTH INSPECTOR NOW WORKING AS CMC, GOKAK TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI |
| 8. | SHRI. RAVI SUBHAS RANGASABHE AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: SENIOR HEALTH INSPECTOR NOW WORKING AT CMC, GOKAK TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI |
| 9. | SHRI. J C TAMBOLI AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: SENIOR HEALTH INSPECTOR NOW WORKING AT CMC, GOKAK TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI |
| 10. | SHRI. JAGADISH H. ITI AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: OFFICE MANAGER NOW WORKING AT TMC, MUDALAGI TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI |
| 11. | SHRI. SHIVANAND D. WALISHETTI AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: REVENUE OFFICER NOW WORKING AT TMC, MUDALAGI TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI |
3
4
5
... PETITIONERS
(By Sri./Smt : R K KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
AND
... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri./Smt : GA-SD)
6
This WP is filed under article 226 & 227 of the constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to consider the representations dated: 15.10.2014 and 20.02.2015 vide annexures-C and D by the petitioners and to pass appropriate orders on them.
This petition coming on for Orders this day, the Hon’ble Court, made the following.
O R D E R
“The learned Counsel for the petitioners is granted six weeks’ time to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed automatically, without further reference to the Court.”
Sd/JUDGE
Note: As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 10.02.2016 the Advocate for the Petitioners has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this WP No. 105641/2015 stands dismissed, as per the Court Order dated: 25/11/2015.
SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By :- afh R- By:C- By:-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners' representations regarding their appointments should be considered by the respondents.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SHRI DEEPAK SHRIKANT HARADI (11 PETITIONERS)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION FOR STATE OF KARNATAKA
RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
