Petitioners filed a writ petition seeking to quash an endorsement and direct authorities to grant a pay scale revision. The court initially granted six weeks to comply with office objections. Per a subsequent note, the petition was dismissed due to non-compliance with those objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
DATED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN
WP NO 102467-470 OF 2015 [S-RES]
BETWEEN
AGE:64 YEARS, OCC. RETD. JUNIOR WORK INSPECTOR R/O YARAGATTI, TQ. SAUNDATTI DIST. BELAGAVI AND OTHERS
AGE:61 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED AS JUNIOR WORK INSPECTOR R/O HANCHINAL, TQ. SAUNDATTI DIST. BELAGAVI
AGE:61 YEARS, OCC. RETD AS A JR. WORK INSPECTOR R/O NESARGI, TQ. BAILHONGAL DIST.BELAGAVI
... PETITIONERS
(By Sri./Smt : Y R JOGI, ADVOCATE)
2
AND
... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri./Smt : GA SD)
3
This WP is filed under article 226 & 227 of constitution of India praying to quashing the endorsement no.sum.jasaa/esq/ki.ke.ni/ka.u.nya.71442-71473/ 2013/2014-15 dated 21.04.2014 issued by the respondent no. 2 as per annexure-F by issuing writ in the nature or certiorari and directing the respondents no.1 and 2, to consider the representations dated 22.07.2014 as per annexure-H filed by the petitioners and pay the pay scale of Rs. 120-240 with all consequential benefits to the petitioners from the date of appointment of service.
This petition coming on for Orders this day, the Hon’ble Court, made the following.
O R D E R
“The learned Counsel for the petitioners is granted Six weeks’ time to comply with the office objections, failing which the petitions stands dismissed automatically, without further reference to the Court.”
Sd/JUDGE
Note: As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 10.02.2016 the Advocate for the Petitioners have not complied with the office objections. Hence, this WP No. 102467-102470/2015 stands dismissed, as per the Court Order dated: 25/11/2015.
SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By :- afh R- By:C- By:-
Dundappa S/o Andaneppa Bali
Basavaraj S/o Irappa Tilanganji
Siddappa S/o Veerappa Jadar
Mallikarjun S/o Shivalingappa Angadi
The State of Karnataka
The Chief Engineer Water Resource Development Department
Raghvendra S. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
