This court dismissed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution as withdrawn by the petitioner after counsel filed a withdrawal memo.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
WRIT PETITION No.2290 OF 2012 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
Sri. Krishna S Tavildar, Son of Late S.K.Tavildar, Aged about 40 years, Residing at No.412, 5th Main, 5th Cross, Kengeri Satellite Town, Bangalore.
…PETITIONER
(By Shri. A.S.Mahesha, Advocate)
AND:
Sri. Syed Basheer, Son of Late Lalu Saheb, Aged about 77 years, Residing at V.V. Extension, Hoskote, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore.
…RESPONDENT
2
This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the entire records in O.S.No.7419/2006 on the file of X Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore and to quash the order dated 22.7.2011 on I.A.No.3 in O.S.No.7419/2006 on the file of X Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore vide Annexure-E as said order suffers from errors which are apparent face of records.
This Writ Petition coming on for Orders this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R
The learned Counsel for the petitioner files a memo
seeking to withdraw the petition.
The memo is placed on record and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
nv
Sri. Krishna S Tavildar
Sri. Syed Basheer
Anand Byrreddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
