B N Mogappa v. Shankaranarayana Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that no case made out to take cognizance as complaint filed one and half years after incident and alleged offence did not occur in public view. Petition rejected without warrant for interference.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 677/2012
BETWEEN :
Sri. B N Mogappa S/o. B H Nirvanaiah Aged about 32 years R/a. No. 337, 3rd cross 5th Main, Rajagopalanagara Peenya 2nd Stage Bangalore – 560 058. (By Sri. Kemparaju, Adv.)
… PETITIONER
AND :
Shankaranarayana Sharma Production Manager GERB Vibration Control Systems Pvt. Ltd., No. 27A, 2nd Phase Peenya Industrial Area Bangalore – 560 058 And also R/a. No. 1167 1st Main, 1st Cross BEL Layout
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court below was correct in rejecting the complaint for filing beyond limitation and lack of public view.
Whether the Criminal Revision Petitioner warrants interference to set aside the lower court order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sri. B N Mogappa
- respondent
Shankaranarayana Sharma
Coram
Anand Byrareddy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.RP/677/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court