Sri Suresh K G v. Smt Jyothi S G
Case brief
What is this about?
Court granted permission to file a converter application to convert a criminal revision petition into a Revision Petition Family Court.
Court granted permission to file a converter application to convert a criminal revision petition into a Revision Petition Family Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.709 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
Sri. Suresh K.G., S/o. late K.G. Basavanagowda, Aged about 54 years, Working as Selection Grade Lecturer, Civil Engineering Department, Bapuji Polytechnic College, Residing at No.3367/8, 13th Main, 5th Cross, M.C.C. ‘B’ Block, Kuvempu Nagar, (Old R.T.O. Road), Davanagere-577 004. …PETITIONER
(By Shri. Muralidhar H.M., Advocate)
AND:
2
All three petitioners are residing at No.3367/8, 13th Main, 5th Cross, MCC ‘B’ Block, Kuvempu Nagar, (Old R.T.O Road), Davanagere-577 004.
…RESPONDENTS
This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set aside the impugned order dated 4.7.2014 passed in Crl.Misc.No.243/2013 vide Annexure-A, consequently dismiss the petition or in the alternative pass such other order.
This petition coming on for orders this day, the court made the following:
3
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo
seeking permission to convert the present revision petition into a Revision Petition Family Court (RPFC).
The memo is placed on record. Permission is granted.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KS
Sri. Suresh K.G.
Smt. Jyothi S.G.
Kum. Jeevitha S.G.
Master Ishanth S.G.
ANAND BYRAREDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court