Mahadeva Naika v. Nagamani
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal challenged the confirmation of a judgment holding that suit properties were joint family properties, rejecting a self-acquired property defense.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed with no costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 5th DAY OF JUNE, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.ABDUL NAZEER
R.S.A.No.830 OF 2011 (PAR & POS)
BETWEEN:
MAHADEVA NAIKA S/O LATE SOMA NAIKA AGED 45 YEARS R/AT TAGADUR NANJANGUD TALUK MYSORE DIST. … APPELLANT
(By Sri O.SHIVARAMA BHAT, ADV.)
AND:
- 1 NAGAMANI AGED 37 YEARS W/O SHIVANNA NAYAKA TONDAVADI, GUNDLUPET TALUK
- 2 SMT. GOWRAMMA AGED 37 YEARS W/O MADESHA NAIKA R/AT TAGADUR NANJANGUD TALUK 570001
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to 1/5th share in the suit schedule properties.
Whether the properties purchased by the first defendant in 1958 and 1985 are joint family properties.
Whether the palu patti entered into between defendant Nos. 1 and 2 is binding on the plaintiffs.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mahadeva Naika
- respondent
Nagamani
- respondent
Smt. Gowramma
- respondent
Soma Naika
- respondent
Anka Naika
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/830/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court