The Karnataka High Court dismissed the second appeal filed by M.R. Nagabhushana Shetty for non-prosecution, noting that office objections were not complied with and court costs remained undeposited.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 5th DAY OF JUNE, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.ABDUL NAZEER
R.S.A.No.2462 OF 2010 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
M.R.NAGABHUSHANA SHETTY, S/O LATE M R RAMASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, D’ GROUP EMPLOYEE, KPTCL (BESCOM), SRI NEELAKANTESHWARA BADAVANE, WARD NO.12, CHITRADURGA-577501.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI H.D.NAGARAJ & S.GANGADHARA, ADVS. - ABSENT)
AND:
2
NO.57, ADYAMA STREET, CHINNAKADAI STREET, SALEM-1 ( T N )
... RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DT. 18.6.2010 PASSED IN R.A.NO. 19/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. DIST. JUDGE, CHITRADURGA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DT. 13.1.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO. 36/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN), CHITRADURGA.
THIS RSA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Despite grant of sufficient time, office objections have not been complied with. The cost imposed on 18.2.2013 has also not been deposited.
3
dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
KLY/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal can be dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-appearance of the appellant.
M.R. Nagabhushana Shetty
M.R. Babukumar
M.R. Ashok Kumar Shetty
M.R. Vijayalakshmi
M.R. Manjunath Shetty
M.R. Shobhadevi
S. Abdul Nazeer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
