Disposed

Sadashiva Acharya v. Jeevandas Adyanthaya

Karnataka HC30 Jan 2013MFA/5578/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Lok Adalat of the High Court of Karnataka conciliated a motor vehicle accident claim dispute where the insurance company agreed to pay an enhanced compensation amount. The first appeal was disposed of based on a joint memo settling the claim.

What did the court decide?

Award modified to reflect settlement; Insurance Company to pay Rs. 40,000 with interest in full and final settlement.

Sadashiva Acharya Vs Jeevandas Adyanthaya — Consumer Protection | Karnataka HC (2013)

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

¶3

DATED THIS THE 30th DAY OF JANUARY, 2013

¶4

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶5

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI AND

¶6

SRI. A.K.BHAT, MEMBER

¶7

MFA No.5578/20 12

¶8

Lok Adalat No.755/2012

¶9

Between:

¶10

Sadashiva Acharya, Kantharagoli, Yerlapady Village. Karkala Taluk. Aged about 42 years, R/at Vish\Ta Kripa. S/o.sri.Laxman Acharva,

¶11

Appellant

¶12

(By Sri. H.Pavana Chandra Shetty, Advocate)

¶13

And:

¶14

Aged about 62 years. Jeevandas Adyanthaya.

¶15

Residing near Gomateshwara Betta. S/ o . Late N. Shankar Adyanthaya.

¶16

Karkala [‘aluk. Danashae. Karkala Kasaba Village.

¶17

Karkala Branch, A.S.Road, Karkala. The Branch Manager, The United India Insurance Co.Ltd.. 2.

¶18

Respondents

¶19

(By Sri. M.U.Poonacha, Adv. for R-2)

¶20

AWARD DATED 3-5-2012 PASSED IN MVC NO.420/2011 ON ThE FILE OF CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ADDL. MACT, KARKALA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE COMPENSATION. MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST ThE JUDGMENT AND

¶21

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILiATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT AFTER BEING REFERRED VIDE ORDER DATED 27-7-2012. ThE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶22

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶23

The learned counsel for the Claimant and the learned counsel for the Respondent — Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶24

After is The on behalf of the parties to this effect. to till the date of deposit, matter 2. has and the the Insurance Company has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.40.000/- (Rupees negotiations, settled. Respondentprolonged agreed Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. A joint Memo is filed receive in addition to what has been awarded by the appellant—claimant Forty Thousand only) with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition

¶25

The Respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the of Award, 3. preparation interest at 9/ii per annum from the date of default. till the date of deposit. said amount before the Tribunal, within six weeks from the date of failing which the said amount shall carry

¶26

¶27

¶28

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant.

¶29

accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. 5. This miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The award of the Thbunal shall stand modified

¶30

sal
UDGt

Sadashiva Acharya v. Jeevandas Adyanthaya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sadashiva Acharya v. Jeevandas Adyanthaya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Balasubramanya Vs Smt. Saraswathi Shreenath

P John Vs the New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Sri a M Manjunath Vs M/S Ksrtc

Annappa Choudappa Vs Jayanthi S Mahale

K Lalithamma Vs Srinivasa

G T Sharan Kumar Vs Mohammed Munavar