Disposed

G T Sharan Kumar v. Mohammed Munavar

Karnataka HC30 Jan 2013MFA/2682/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lok Adalat settled a claim for enhancement of compensation in a motor vehicle accident case. The Tribunal's insurance company undertook to pay an additional Rs. 10,000 lump sum, which would justify modifying the original award.

What did the court decide?

Respondent Insurance Company agreed to pay an additional lump sum of Rs. 10,000 within six weeks; Tribunal's award modified to include it.

G T Sharan Kumar Vs Mohammed Munavar — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2013)

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

¶3

DATED THIS THE 30th DAY OF JANUARY, 2013

¶4

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶5

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI

¶6

AND

¶7

SRI. A.K.BHAT, MEMBER

¶8

MFA No.2682/2010

¶9

Lok Adalat No.470/2012

¶10

Between:

¶11

G.T.Sharan Kumar, Resident of Byalahal Village, Aged about 36 years, S /o .Thippeswamy, Agriculturist Chitradurga Taluk.

¶12

(By Sri. B.M.Siddappa, Advocate)

¶13

And:

¶14

Appellant

¶15

Mohammed Munavar, S/o.Jagalur Charnan Sab.

¶16

KA- 16/8626 Owner of Auto Rickshaw Aged about 42 years.

¶17

Resident at No.300.

¶18

Filter House Road.

¶19

Near Kukkadamma Temple.

¶20

Ch itradurga Town.

¶21

Akkamahadevi Road, United India Insurance Co.Ltd., Divisional Office, 2. The Divisional Manager, MMK Complex. No.34/3, P.B.No.237.

Respondents

P.J.Extension,

Davanagerc.

(By Sri. Ravish Benni, Adv. for R-2)

¶26

(SRDN.) & THE CHITRAI)URGA. FOR COMPENSATION ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. SEEKING PETITION ADDL. ALLOWING CLAIM ADDL. AND CIVIL JUDGE MACT. AWARD DATED 21-1] -2009 PASSED IN MVC NO.516/2008 ON TFIE FILE OF I MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND PARTLY

¶27

I 2-04-2012, TIlE REFERRED ORDER THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOX ADALAT VIDE AFTER BEING DATED FOLLOWING (;ONC1LIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶28

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶29

— Insurance Company along with its representative are present. The learned counsel Ibr the Claimant and the learned counsel for the Respondent

¶30

filed on behalf of the parties to this effect. Respondent matter has 2. appellant-claimant the Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump sum of Rs. 10,000/and negotiations. the settled. the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. A joint Memo is prolonged agreed receive is (Rupees Ten Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by After The to

¶31

preparation of Award, said amount before the Tribunal, within six weeks from the date of failing which the said amount shall carry The Respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the

¶32

¶33

the Joint memo. The award of the Thbunal shall stand modified

¶34

raIDS!

G T Sharan Kumar v. Mohammed Munavar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G T Sharan Kumar v. Mohammed Munavar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Balasubramanya Vs Smt. Saraswathi Shreenath

P John Vs the New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Sri a M Manjunath Vs M/S Ksrtc

Annappa Choudappa Vs Jayanthi S Mahale

K Lalithamma Vs Srinivasa

Sadashiva Acharya Vs Jeevandas Adyanthaya