Three petitioners sought directions to reckon their service from the date of appointment rather than grant-in-aid. The court disposed of the petitions by relying on a similar earlier decision.
The writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order passed in W.P.Nos.6667-6704/2012.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI
WRIT PETITION Nos.45176-178/2012 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O NARAYANA SHETTY,
OCC: ASST. INSTRUCTOR, WORKING AT NRAM POLYTECHNIC (AIDED) NITTE POST, KARKALLA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT
KARNATAKA-574 110
OCC: ASST. INSTRUCTOR,
2
NITTE POST, KARKALLA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA-574 110
...PETITIONERS
AND:
...RESPONDENTS
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 & 2 DIRECTING THEM TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE SERVICE OF THE PETITIONERS FROM THE DATE OF THEIR INITIAL ENTRY IE., FROM THE DATE OF APPOINTMENT INSTEAD OF FROM THE DATE OF THEIR POSTS GRANT-IN-AID.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
Though these matters are listed for compliance of office objections, however the matters itself are considered on merit.
notice for respondents.
respondents to take into account the services of the petitioners from the date of their initial entry and not from the date of grant-in-aid.
Having regard to the same, these writ petitions also stand disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.6667-6704/2012, dated 16.03.2012. If the
4
petitioners’ case also falls under the decision of this Court, same may be considered accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
PMR*
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioners are entitled to back wages from date of initial entry or only from date of grant-in-aid status.
Whether these writ petitions can be disposed of by reference to the order passed in similar earlier writ petitions.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.Nos.6667-6704/2012Relied on¶44
W.P.Nos.6667-6704/2012, dated 16.03.2012
MR VIJAYA KUMAR
MR. SATHISH KUMAR
MR. VENKATESH SHENOY
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION
THE DIRECTOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION
SUBHASH B ADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
