Disposed

Sri Prakash G v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC4 Oct 2012WP/23054/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In these writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227, petitioners temporarily appointed as teachers sought regularisation of services. The High Court distinguished similar cases where weightage was granted, noting recruitment was over. The Court directed the society to consider petitioners' requests for temporary appointment only.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.5 directed to consider petitioners' request for temporary appointment.

Sri Prakash G Vs State of Karnataka — Education and Admissions | Karnataka HC (2012)

¶1

WP Nos.23054-62/2012

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

¶4

DATED THIS THE 4^th DAY OF OCTOBER 2012

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI

¶7

WRIT PETITION NOS.23054 TO 23062 OF 2012 (S-REG)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI PRAKASH G AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS S/O JAGADEVAPPA R/O RAGHAVENDRA BADAVANE 1ST CROSS, SHIKARIPURA SHIMOGA DIST- 577 427

¶10

SMT RATHNA T AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS W/O MANJUNATH R/O HULIGINI KATTE, HOSUR POST, SHIKARIPURA SHIMOGA DISTRICT- 577 427

¶11

SRI RAVINDRANATH T H AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O HANUMANTHAPPA T G R/O SUTTUKHOTE SORABA TALUK SHIMOGA DIST-577 427

¶12

SRI DODDANAIKA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O GANGA NAIKA R/O NALLINAKOPPA HOSUR POST, SHIKARIPURA, SHIMOGA DIST- 577 427

¶13

SRI SANGAMESH M K AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶14

WP Nos.23054-62/2012

¶15

¶16

S/O M B KOPPAD 7TH CROSS, CHENNAKESHAVA NAGARA, SHIKARIPURA, SHIMOGA DIST- 577 427

¶17

SRI GANESHAPPA OLEKAR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS S/O HANUMANTHAPPA R/O GUDDADATHIMMINA KATTE, SURAGIHALLI POST, SHIKARIPURA SHIMOGA DIST- 577 427

¶18

SMT RENUKAMBA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS D/O NATARAJ K A R/O VIDYANAGARA, 2ND CROSS, SHIKARIPURA SHIMOGA DIST- 577 427

¶19

SMT PRATHIBA L AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS W/O PARIPURNA TEJASVI H R/O SPURTHI 6TH CROSS, VINOBANAGARA, SHIMOGA- 577 427

¶20

SRI M VINAYAKA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O MOHAN C/O SUPRABHATHA TAILOR 10TH CROSS, M G CIRCLE RAGIGUDDA SHIMOGA DIST- 577204

¶21

...PETITIONERS

¶22

(BY SMT.BHARGAVI D.NAYAK, ADV. FOR SRI.H DEVENDRAPPA, ADV.)

¶23

AND:

¶24

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560001

¶25

WP Nos.23054-62/2012

¶26

¶27

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY THE PRL.SECRETARY TO SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560001

¶28

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY THE PRL.SECRETARY TO RURAL DEVELOPMENT & PANCHAYATRAJ DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING,DR AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560001

¶29

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO PRIMARY & SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, DR AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560001

¶30

THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, (AN ORGANISATION OF SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT),179,1&III FLOOR, ROOPA COMPLEX,I MAIN ROAD, SESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560020

¶31

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SHIMOGA – 577 427

¶32

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF BACKWARD CLASS AND MINORITIES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SHIMOGA DISTRICT, SHIMOGA-577427

¶33

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYATH, SHIMOGA DISTRICT, SHIMOGA-577427

¶34

WP Nos.23054-62/2012

¶35

¶36

THE DISTRICT OFFICER FOR BACKWARD CLASS AND MINORITIES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SHIMOGA DISTRICT, SHIMOGA-577427

¶37

...RESPONDENTS

¶38

(SRI.RAGHAVENDRA G.GAYATRI, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4, R6, R7 & R9 SRI.M.N.MADHUSUDHAN, ADV. FOR R5)

¶39

These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the R6 to R9 to consider the representations of the petitioners dt.21.6.12, vide Ann-E, E1, E2 & E3 & regularise the services of the petitioners and etc.

¶40

These Petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the Court made the following:-

¶41

O R D E R

¶42

The petitioners have sought for a direction to respondent Nos.6 to 9 to consider their representations submitted as per Annexures-E, E1, E2 and E3. They were all appointed temporarily as teachers in Morarji Desai Residential School. However, the Government has issued notification for regular appointment.

¶43

In similar circumstances, this Court has rejected the request of the similarly placed teaching and non-teaching employees for regularisation of their services and in turn,

¶44

WP Nos.23054-62/2012

¶45

¶46

had directed to give weightage for their past service rendered in the Institution.

¶47

Learned Government Pleader submits that the

¶48

recruitment is over and there cannot be any consideration for weightage also.

¶49

Since these petitioners were working on temporary basis and if still vacancies are there, work load is there, respondent No.5 is directed to consider the request of the petitioners atleast for temporary appointment.

¶50

Accordingly, petitions are disposed of.

¶51

Sd/JUDGE

¶52

Sri Prakash G v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Prakash G v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Dhamendra Kumar T P Vs the State of Karnataka

G S Panchakshari Vs the Chief Personnel Manager

Sri R Kalairasan Vs the Deputy Inspector of Police

Puspanjali M C Vs Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited

Sri Manjunath Vs Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation

Shilpa B P Vs State of Karnataka