The High Court disposed of a writ petition wherein the petitioner sought salary benefits under the 3% scheme. The court directed relevant respondent departments to consider the matter and make a decision within three months.
Direction to respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to consider the representation regarding salary grant within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.NO.16558/2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2012
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI
WRIT PETITION No.16558/2012 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI DHAMENDRA KUMAR T P AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O PUTTAMADA SHETTY R/O # 1024/A, 14TH MAIN, BSK 1ST STAGE, 1ST BLOCK, HANUMANTHANAGAR BANGALORE-560050.
...PETITIONER
( BY SMT. M.K. AKHILA, ADV., FOR SMT. K.R. VANITA, ADV.,)
AND:
W.P.NO.16558/2012
2
...RESPONDENTS
( BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA G GAYATHRI, HCGP)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 ND 3 TO GRANT THE SALARY UNDER 3% BENEFIT SCHEME TO THE PETITIONER EQUIVALENT TO THAT OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE GOVT UNDER THE PROVISO TO SEC 87 OF THE KARNATAKA EDUCATION ACT, VIDE ANNX-B
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned High Court Government Pleader is directed to take notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
office objections, however, the matter itself is considered on merit.
W.P.NO.16558/2012
3
W.P.NO.16558/2012
4
from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
PMR*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to salary under the 3% benefit scheme equal to state government employees under Section 87 of the Karnataka Education Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SRI DHAMENDRA KUMAR T P
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
SUBHASH B ADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
