Writ petition filed to quash a circular as arbitrary and unconstitutional. The petitioner requested withdrawal of the writ petition, which was granted, leading to the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn without substantive adjudication on the merits.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.NO.1113/2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI
WRIT PETITION No.1113/2012 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI M VINAYA S/O H R MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS FORMERLY WORKING AS OFFICER GRADE II BEML LTD., AND RESIDING AT “NAGUNANDANA” 2ND CROSS, K C BLOCK, JANNAPURA BHADRAVATHI.
...PETITIONER
( BY M/S SUBBARAO & CO., ADVS.,)
AND:
W.P.NO.1113/2012
2
...RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER AND QUASH THE CIRCULAR NO. 1488 DTD 5.9.11 MARKED AT ANNEX-N ISSUED BY THE R2 AS THE SAME IS ARBITRARY;, ILLEGAL, IRRATIONAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLES, 14, 16, 19 AND 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BESIDES BEING CONTRARY TO SECTION 23 OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGE
PMR*
Sd/-
SRI M VINAYA
THE BEML LTD
THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HR)
THE SENIOR MANAGER (HR)
SUBHASH B ADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
