Petitioner filed a writ petition for modification of impugned orders regarding dearness allowance but sought to withdraw the petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.NO.42628/2011
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI
WRIT PETITION No.42628/2011 (L-KSRTC)
BETWEEN:
N VEERANNA (SENIOR CITIZEN) AGED 64 YEARS BIN NAGANNA, R/O NO.787, SANJEEVININAGAR, 16TH CROSS, SAHAKARANAGAR POST, BANGALORE 560092
...PETITIONER
( BY SRI. LAKSHMAN RAO, ADV.,)
AND:
...RESPONDENTS
( BY SRI. JAGADEESH MUNDARAGI, AGA FOR R2 & R3)
W.P.NO.42628/2011
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTION OR ORDER MODIFYING THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 7.7.2009 AND ALSO THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 8.7.2011 VIDE ANNEXURE A AND B RESPECITVES AND DIRECT TO ADD DEARNESS ALLOWANCE TO THE BASIC PAY IN TERMS OF THE BINDING SETTLEMENTS ENTERED WITH THE EMPLOYEES UNION.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may
be permitted to withdraw the petition.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
PMR*
N VEERANNA
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC
THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER
THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER
SUBHASH B ADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
