Regular first appeal filed under Section 96 of the CPC to set aside a decree. The appellant was absent at the hearing. The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
Dated this the 6th day of August, , 2012
Before
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH
Regular First Appeal 724 / 2003
Between:
Mr Prakash Patrao, 44 yrs S/o H A Patrao, R/a # 178 5th Block, 17th D Main KHB Colony, Koramangala Layout Bangalore
Appellant
(By Sri Rajagopala Naidu, Adv.)
And:
2
(By Sri U Abdul Khader, Adv. For R2-4, 7 & 8)
Appeal is filed under S.96 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying to set aside the judgment and decree dated 28.2.2003 in OS 571/1993 by the XX Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore.
The Appeal coming on for Hearing this day, Court delivered the following:
3
JUDGMENT
None represents the appellant when the case is called. Even in the
afternoon, there is no representation.
Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/Judge
An
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed in the absence of the appellant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr Prakash Patrao
Mrs Irene D'Souza
Mrs Hezel Rebello
Ms Cynthia Patrao
Mrs Pramitha D'cunha
Mrs Juliet Fontes
Huluvadi G Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
