G Roopa v. v T Manjunath
Case brief
What is this about?
Defendant appealed a decree for recovery of sale consideration. The High Court found the trial court failed to properly consider allotment letters showing assignment and excessive interest.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order set aside. Matter remanded to trial court for disposal according to law. Amount in deposit returned; court fee refunded.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
Dated this the 6th day of August, , 2012
Before
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH
Regular First Appeal 658 / 2003
Between:
- 1 Smt G Roopa, 38 yrs W/o T Ramdas
- 2 Sri T Ramdas S/oThimmaiah 44 yrs
- R/a C/o Nanjundappa, II Cross behind Petrol Bunk, Vinoba Nagar Shimoga
Appellants
(By Sri S N Ashwathanarayana, Adv.)
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court properly appreciated evidence regarding allotment letters and assignment of site.
Whether the trial court was justified in granting 24% interest when plaintiffs admitted 12.5%.
Whether the impugned judgment should be remanded for fresh disposal after considering available documents.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt G Roopa
- appellant
Sri T Ramdas
- respondent
Sri V T Manjunath
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/658/2003
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court