Appeal against trial court judgment in partition suit. Trial court held 1978 partition was sound, rejecting claim of nominality. Share in mother's self-acquired land granted. Appeal dismissed. Asset: property title. Aggregate: civil appeal.
Appeal dismissed; trial court judgment upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
�����
������������������������������ ������������������������
������������������ ���������������������
������
���������������������������������������
�������������������������
� �! "#
*+,��-.���/"0-/1� 2�/-�$��$/�.3(��0456/� 7
/"0
�����
��9��
*�5�.6 ��5���(��(�8��5���(����/"0��'�.1�1 -4 0( />> /3�/?/."1����:�.1�[email protected] 0( �."6 �����.1�@."5-�- >��+,����(
�5�.6 ��5��9��5�)(�����5��8�/"0����.1�0.1> "1 0�!.��7
��.1�/>> /3�.1�A.3 0�B"0 -�� 6�.5"�:8�5A��$��/?/."1���� CB0?@ "�� /"0� 0 6- � 0/� 0� �:�������)� >/11 0� ."� ���� �5���)%���'�5"��� �A.3 �5A��.4.3��B0? �*�-���"�7�D����(��/0/?( >/-�3,�0 6- ."?��� �1B.��A5-�>/-�.�.5"�/"0�1 >/-/� �>511 11.5"�
��.1�/>> /3�65@."?�B>�A5-�A."/3�� /-."?���.1�0/,( �������������������0 3.4 - 0��� �A5335!."?�CB0?@ "��
��;��
��������
��)��
ISSUES
Addl. Issue No.1:
Whether the 2nd defendant proves that he is the absolute owner of RS No.279/1A for the reasons pleaded in para 8 of written statement?
sound and the contention that it is nominal is rejected and also only in respect of Schedule 1(p) which is an agricultural land measuring 4 Acres 2 guntas bearing R,S. No. 279/1A in respect of other properties, the suit is dismissed. The said properties in which the share is given to
the plaintiff no.1 is said to be the property belonging to his mother and that plaintiff no.1, his brothers and sisters are entitled to equal share.
��8��
The plaintiff being aggrieved by the judgment and award have filed this appeal.
��%� �����
+44
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the 1978 partition was nominal and inequitable?
Whether the 1st plaintiff is entitled to specific shares in suit properties?
Whether the father of defendants 13(c) and (d) was a bonafide purchaser?
Appellants/Plaintiffs
Defendants
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
