Discusses a review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC filed to challenge a High Court order. The court found no grounds for interference and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed with no grounds to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO
R.P. No.267/2011
BETWEEN:-
MR. WILFRED C. PAIS, S/O. ANTONY C. PAIS, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. NULIYAR, NARIMOGARU VILLAGE AND POST, PUTTUR TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT.
PETITIONER (BY SRI M. VISHWAJITH RAI & JAYAPRAKASH K.N., ADVS.)
AND:-
DIANA R. PAIS, W/O. WILFRED C. PAIS, R/O. BALLUR HOUSE, KANNUR POST AND VILLAGE, MANGALORE, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT.
RESPONDENT
(BY SRI CYRIL PRASAD PAIS, ADVOCATE)
This Review Petition is filed Under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, praying for review the Order dated 05-04-2011 passed in WP.11193/2011 (GM-CPC), on the file of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore.
2
This R.P. is coming on for admission this day, the court made the following:
ORDER
No grounds to interfere. Petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
NM*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should interfere in the existing review order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Wilfred C. Pais
Diana R. Pais
K. Sreedhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
