Dismissed
Sri R Sampath v. Smt Annamma
Karnataka HCRFA/663/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY 2012
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 663/2012
BETWEEN:
SRI R. SAMPATH, S/O. SRI M. RAJAGOPAL, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO. 76, RAMAKRISHNAPPA ROAD, COX TOWN, BANGALORE – 560 005
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI K.B. LOKANATH, ADV.)
AND:
… RESPONDENTS
2
THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC. 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 02.08.2010 PASSED IN O.S. NO. 1492/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE II-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
In view of the objection raised by the registry, the instant appeal would have to be presented before the Lower Appellate Court. In that view, the registry to return the appeal papers along with Court fee to enable the learned counsel for the appellant to present it before the Court having jurisdiction.
with liberty to approach the jurisdictional Court.
Sd/JUDGE
ST*
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri R. Sampath
Smt Annamma
Mrs Sagaya Mery
A.S. Bopanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court