регулярная первая апелляция №283/2010, поданная против решения о выселении, была отклонена судом Великого Карнатаки, так как жалобщик не исполнил приказ судьи.
Appeal dismissed for non-compliance with court order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY 2012
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPANNA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.283/2010
BETWEEN:
SRI M. REHAMAN SHARIFF, S/O. MUSTHAK AHMAD, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, SHOP NO. 2, PREMISES NO. 19/2, NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD, NAGAWARA, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI HARISHA O.K, ADV.)
AND:
SRI SHAIK ABDUL KHADAR, S/O. LATE SHAIK JANU SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 19/2, NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD, NAGAWARA, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE
... RESPONDENT
2
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.10.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.719/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING :
JUDGMENT
There is no representation.
2. Despite peremptory order, compliance has not been
made. Hence, appeal is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
ST
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed despite non-compliance with a peremptory order?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI M. REHAMAN SHARIFF
SRI SHAIK ABDUL KHADAR
A S BOPANNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
