Lok Adalat disposed of an appeal filed against an award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. The insurance company agreed to pay an additional lump sum of Rs. 30,000 as a full and final settlement, modifying the Tribunal's award.
Additional lump sum of Rs. 30,000 paid; Tribunal award modified; Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 12th DAY OF JUNE, 2012
CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE B.MANOHAR AND
SRI. MU.POONACHA, MEMBER
2009
Lok Adalat No.233/2012
BETWEEN:
Shantharam Poojarv, R/oAiandoor. Shiroor ViiIaLe S/e Koppayya Poojarv, Aged about 28 years, & Post. Kundapu ra Taluk.
Appellant
(By SrLH,Pavana Chandra Shetty, Advocate)
AND
A.ed about 38 vea.rs, Umesh Meshh, 5/cLMariJunatha Mestia. I.
Kundapura TaIu..k, R/OCTOi1gund1, Shroor Viiiate.
LThI dOuli IuII. Respondents -t Main Road, Kundapura. The New India Assurance Cccbtd,, Rep. by its DivisIonal Manager. 2. \C r.. 1. LLJ5fLjE3d idUIiGitl&L
(By Sri. MNarayanappa, Advocate for R2)
) PdNJT f’ IS FILED LI/S 17311) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JURGMENT AND AWARD a. OS 2007 a.SSI LI IN HVC fl 10 l/20c 1 0’ T 3LI()L A52 IHE I lIE I F CILO JU I’ SLF121EI IGE .I1VIiL\F 1)3 CON P\JSAiVYS DA LD
IIIING RI I i’..RREI) siDE ORI)I It I)flL25 11 2011. ORI)ER P3 P SSEIL ‘II US 1PPEiU COMING ON FOR CONCIUArnOr% LiErORE LOlL ADALAF AFTER FITF FOLI.OWINC
CONCILIATION ORDER
eoun%cl for Insw ance rompanv along with Its representative are Thc learm d counsel for the ppcllani Claimant intl the learned
present
2 matter The ret eivu rngotiatlons ha” and Insurance C ompany has agreed to pay a lump suni of Rs.30.000/Respondent settled. agreed tlw prolonged 1% is filed on beltalt ol the Panic’s to this effect. the (Rupees Ilurty Thousand only), m addition to what has been awarded by thc Thbunal in lull and final settlement of the (jahu. A joint Mento appc llant claimant to After
3 it 9 %hall (qrn [‘he Re%poudent ‘ic’ a i i”tt’-’re’—t rjhj,j,l ithu’ ‘r w °k ad lie x,si’ ii fid on ol Insurance Company has agre”d to deposit the idilili’ ‘vhlch ‘he said anou 11 from h id’ • ‘hi’ cLu’ ul det.i’th. nil flit uate of ik 1
Lflt ‘-‘iiLii(’ t t’Il)IlCti C ‘)fiijIt’ i%Itiflhs Shallhi’isLea,rciit;iavcur‘‘ .l 1
I he the a’citrd ThIs nilseelkineous flrct appeal stands disposed or in lenus of Joint memo it COT drngh 1)raw up the Awat d iccordingly 5. il the ‘Tribunal haIl stand modified
e
,JDà
V—). S
RR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shantharam Poojarv
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
B.Manohar
M. Poonacha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
