A Lok Adalat disposed of an appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award by recording a settlement where the insurer agreed to deposit Rs. 40,000 with interest.
Answering a sum of Rs. 40,000 with interest; the insurer to deposit said amount within four weeks from date of receipt of the order failing which it shall earn from that date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 08th DAY OF JUNE, 2012
CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
AND HONBLE MR. JUSTICE DVSHYLENDRA KUMAR
SMT. PRABHA MURTHY, MEMBER
Lok Adalat NoA56/2012
Between:
Aged about 61 years, 13angalor Easi Taluk. BanLiaiore 7. W/oiingappa, Gunjur Pos 1. R/oVinavanakanaL5ar. Smt, Seethamma,
Appellant
(By Sri, Shripad V,Shastri & K,VNaik, Advocates)
And:
I, 137, Ba1aere Viiiar. 1 V al.1.n.i.sr ..[-i0D1i. 2.. 1 — 560 001 By its Mariager. .. S/aM iruveliauya. Respondents Bana.iore (0 B.M.Srinivasa. Banca lore United India Insurance Co.Ltd., •Shankar Narrvana Bldg.. D.O.5, No.25, 87.
(By SrLL,Sreekanta Rao, Advocate for R2)
Ii 115 MF’,\ Is 1 ILEI) I IS 17:1 1) OP MV A AG.\INST FIlE iITL)OMENT ANt) MV,\J<i) J);\FED 2N 115 2OO) PASSEI) IX )I\’(’ NO 03i3/ 2( >05 OX Fl IF PILE 01” Fl Ill XXII ,\J)f)J, S\L\LI WSES iT DOE N MEMBER M.\CT. BAX(;AL )RE, I’ARTI V .\1J. VJXG 11 IF’ IAIM PETI I’I( \ I2 )R (2 )MPENSa liON ‘0<1) SEEKING EXT I,\CLMFNF OF (1 )\IPEXS \I1O. Fills ‘211 ‘2 OMING OX I OR (OX( I 2 \IION EFFORt OK Ai),\L\I ‘2 IER it INS RI I’ FRRI D \ [Dl ORDI I 1) \ 1 Fl) 1111 POll OWING tOM 121 WON ORIE I IS I S1 D ii 0 1 201)
CONCILIATION ORDER
‘1’lii appeal I tas beeii rrl’erred to Lok ;\d1tiE tt)f eXJ)lOfiJILi the possibihii’v 01 11i anucable settlement beiween the parties. The appellant being a person who has been injured in a road accident irnohing a motor x chicle and who had put forth i daim before the Motor A ick ni C laims Tribunal at Bangalore and th tribunal had awarded a total etmpen—ation i)f H42IOO/ with interest at 6G per airnu’ii 1mm the da>F’ el petition >111 rcalizaiion.
2 flu laimaul I ciiw ut atisIied with ti ie ir lilication 01 he i ii eI1 I Ii H uBlitt1 I IL t\ it I Ip (1 F S Or 1‘S i I V i’,’ “Jji]’ l( I its r u I , I ci aaii’ jaiII iN 5” ha a l-P ,u’a-$ t aliPh ‘‘1!T2II\ ‘i>ttI’tj(’ai III IF I S Ihat I’ ‘ho I I 1 4 ( ts( artd , “r ;i tI uun I p ur 2N h(
compensation aarded by 11w Thbunal that can bring a satisfactory cud to thc difference between 11w partIes
lnswanct (‘ompan) agiecing to pay ‘i ‘urn of 40.000/ with flit Respondent appeal. the learnc d counsel br tiw panic s i’id’rarng that the matter is settled 4. iii respect of all claims. whIch 1% die subject matter of this A .Joint 1emo 1% placed to this eliect before the Adalai siwied by
t interest respondent Insunmc e Co. shall deposit thi said amount it bOo p from the date oi default all the date 3 before the rrtbunal within four weeks from the date of receipt ol a copy ol this order. tailing which the said amount shall earn f dcpostt l’h
Lj• The appeal — dlspvsccl ‘A ‘n ternis ‘d the .lolnt Memo and
si ttleincnt.
nc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellate court can direct the respondent insurance company to pay a sumless than the Tribunal award as a compromise?
Smt. Seethamma
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
DVSHYLENDRA KUMAR
PRABHA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
