Lok Adalat conciliated an appeal where the appellant was dissatisfied with Motor Accident Claims Tribunal compensation. Parties settled with respondent agreeing to pay additional Rs. 1,50,000.
Joint Memo recorded for apreciliated amount of Rs. 1,50,000 with interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARIATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 25th DAY OF JUNE, 2012
CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
AND SRI. GANGADHAR SANGOLLI, MEMBER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR
celleous First Appeal No.2941 2010 Lok Adalat No.512/2010
Between:
Aged about 42 years. JRNagar (P), S/o.Madaiah, R/at D,No35, Ra mababunagar. M.Urnesh. Mysore.
Appellant
(By M/s.P.Nataraju Associates, Advocates)
And:
, iJJ\rsore I KSRTC. City Depot, Urban Division.. Bannimanta.p, The Divisional Controller,
(By Smt, HRRcnuka, Advocate for R1)
V’C H WAGD PFSSF H THIS MFA IS FILED U/Si73 (1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND FAST DD 2fl C iMJPSII)ING NO 101 . PARTLY All 9 9 2 MO PHI FF1 Z’AST JCfl i/F U AlA THE. N
F,
.4 S
FOR REFERRED ORDER FOlLOWING SEEKING VIDE COMPENSATION ENHANCEMENT COMPENSATION. DATED CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CLAiM I$EING AND ThE PEInION ThIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE 1.0K ADALAT AFTER 08-07-2011. OF
CONCILIATION ORDER
rate of 696 per annum from the date of petition till realization. appellant being a person who has been Injured In a road accident awarded a total compensation of Rs.1.94,500/- with interest at the possibility of an amicable settlement between the parties. The This appeal has been referred to Lok Adalat for exploring the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Mysore and the Tribunal had involving a motor vehicle and who had put forth a claim before the
compensation amount has come up in appeal. 2. The claimant being not satisfied with the quantification of the
Thousand only) over and above the compensation awarded by the P.Nataraju Assts., leaned counsel appearing for the appellant and pay an additional amount of Rs. 1,50.000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty 3. agreed between the parties that if the respondent - K.S.RtC.. should K.S.RT.C., the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and it is Smt. H.R.Renuka, learned counsel appearing for the respondent With the help of learned counsel for the parties namely MIs.
3
Thbunal that can bring a satisfactory end to the difference between the parties.
- K.S.RZC., the learned counsel for the parties indicating that the matter Is settled this appeal. with the Respondent agreeing to pay a sum of Rs. 1 ,50.000/- in respect of all claims, which Is the subject matter of 4. A Joint Memo Is placed to this effect before the Adalat signed by
- KS.R.t C. shall deposit the said amount at 10% p.a. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. cow of this order, failing which the said amount shall carry Interest The respondent before the Tribunal within four weeks from the date of receipt of a 5.
DistrIbution and investment of the enhanced compensation also to be In the same manner as has been ordered by the Tribunal. 6.
settlement. 7. The appeal Is disposed of In terms of the Joint Memo and
Sd! JUDGE
M. Umesh
K.S.RTC
D.V.Shyendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
