Lok Adalat disposed of a miscellaneous first appeal regarding an insurance claim. It reduced the compensation awarded to Rs. 10,000 as full and final settlement, to be released in the appellant's favor.
A settlement of Rs. 10,000 in addition to Tribunal's award for full and final settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 21st DAY OF JUNE, 2012
CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
AND SRI. JWALA KUMAR, MEMBER HOWBLE MR. JUSTICE B.V.PINTO
liscellapsFirstAepQ4L3010 Lok Adalat No.534/2012
BETWEEN:
Now aged about 60 nears. Dakshina Kauriada Dtsirct. Narasirnha Naya.k, Bantwal Taluk, Perne Post 12 ViIIa.ge, Son of Ganapathi. Naak. Residing a Perne House,
Appellant
(By SrI Nishwanatha Poojary.K., Advocate)
.1 22:3 dana Moose. M ai on. icr ow aged kbout 29 years., ‘_...llI I. S,Vidva. Prasa.d, Beih.roor Post K Vtilage. 2. Kpnala Of AND: t.J .. •Soi. of Bahu •Shetfs, 1 ct1. j(j, are non. iViO.I1i2n;r J[JdJtI ii Maamaa Kuufii, R/ o,2-63, Ileii.yoor t.i.ou.se, Dakshiua Kannada Disulet .hantwal TaIu.k, Son of iVLS*Moosa, 1) .1
a
‘1
t1 i%hnU Prakasli. LdupI Distict Y1 Tnikshln’ Kann,ili Disirl’ i Sau iriaiid’ Itn.la. l)Ivlsloiwl off cc 2 riFloor Court 1k a’ R’ P Ho 5 t ciitt Pt xP M’in’od titi ki1lact. baxi’w’! laltik Ft ii ci Iisn I I .lupi Taluk, UaIsIi ill t 1 he flriental Insut ante (‘u.Ltd. theN tor liii juL nibatagi.j “i’t,l-’ Respondents branch Office. Dliii masihala Btnh lint. fit. Dlvi ft w Vi Xni and lxi 40’ 4, •. ‘.
LB” Sri’ N Rn’st 4Benn Ador it’ f0r *31
1’ K 1\Rfl1 (23.) %1 1CI 2O’Ss[i ii fr (LM ki 111.10 ‘4”’ •R r( % i\’ ‘‘1I’fjIIlC.KF1) 1111.tvl$t 1(1! 01 111 Ic T IC 1fl%L i’r ‘UGMrN IN’. ‘w’j, M.l Is I II Ir, r ‘S I ALl OWING ‘011’ M’ sro PU fl i”c X
I I I 1C.v .1 :ziS ?111 11 (cfli \ci ‘ ‘\ i ii ‘‘ cd C IV K”i ii lOFt. s 1 1 ) 1 ! ). I tASSI I. If ‘ .til )I I’i IS ‘rA fl 1 r ft a fl) •
CONCILIATION ORDER
I ‘ 1 : M*wlIu1r
t P ci flr ‘ I fr’ ., 4 ( (hr lt,• 1 ‘i II’ nJ’ Ig)’ I p .hr ( I nnui I
‘ fl •“‘i1’t 4_. liP I’ .iunc a C •“
Ic I — j . t,i ‘‘ i.,i I 1., ii fl .. ,% it’ r--:’ ii 1 ,tr., •.ti. .‘ • ft. ‘i £ I I ( • ‘a •i L i ‘V • V • •S 3 — • a’
3
(Rupees Ten Thousand only) in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. A joint Memo is filed on behalf of the parties to this effect.
the date of deposit. the date of preparation of Award, falling which the said amount shall carry Interest at 9% per annum from the date of default, till deposit the said amount before the Tribunal, within six weeks from 3. The Respondent No.3 -Insurance Company has agreed to
The entire enhanced compensation shall be released In favour of the appellant. 4.
the Joint memo. The award of the Tribunal shall stand modified ThIs miscellaneous first appeal stands disposed of in tcnns of accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. 5.
sal IUDGE
RR
Narashimbha Navaik
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
Sri. Jwala Kumar
Mr. Justice B.V. Pinto
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
