Dismissed
Shri Lingappa S/O Kalappa Aushe Anr. v. Shri Vithal Reddy S/O Gunda Reddy Anr.
Karnataka HCCRL.RP/2532/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
H N C CRLRPSO 2332 2012 BETWbEN i t1< [C C’.…
What the court decided
AI extract
H N C CRLRPSO 2332 2012 BETWbEN i t1< [C C’.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COOT KA )FNN( H
N C
CRLRPSO 2332 2012
BETWbEN
*it
BY SIlT. S S. t MADAPUR AIJV.’
AND
,R1 I XC 1M) RI flj \i ‘1 11113 fOR
2
PE’flTIONERS PRAYING ThAT ThIS HON’BLE COURT 10 SET ASIDE ThE ORDER DATED 12.01.2012 AS WELL AS TO QUASH ThE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO. 142/2009 ON ThE FILE OF ThE JMFC AT BASAVAKALYAN.
ThIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION ThIS DAY, ThE COURT MADE ThE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioners are the accused In the private
complaint. The police have filed the ‘B’ report In the complaint filed by the first respondent. The first respondent has filed protest petition. The procedure U/S.200 of Cr.P.C. Is complied. Notice has been Issued to the petitioners/accused. The Magistrate has followed the procedure U/Ss.244 and 245 of Cr.P.C. for recording the evidence of the witnesses produced by the complainant. The witnesses who examined U/Ss.244 and 245 of Cr.P.C. have been cross-examined by the petitioners.
‘I
I)etitiollersatthisstageseekingbrquashingdonot arise.
petition is dismissed.
JUDGE Sd/
Sri
[C C']
JCIM RI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court