Brief order treating a petition challenging police investigation into IPC 171-E charges as a factual defense requiring evidence, hence dismissing the criminal petition without substantive adjudication.
Criminal petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CIRC UIT BENCH 1’ GUI BARGA IN 1HZ IIGh )jE . Ga
i NI ) 11 r’
I- ‘ ) r -
I \ \ 13 (j c H 1 ,U
GRijuI SAL PtiIiIO’ NUJJI9I/2010
BETWFEN
iBt sn tLK Bukka Acn-o ate)
SND
i ai dA -,P tI$t 1 tie i $
I3iclar. iii the interest oIJustic’c and equity. Additional C.J.M. Couri at Bidar. in the interest ofjustiee and equity.
This petition coming on for Admission this clay, the Court made the following:
ORDER
It is the contention of the petitioners that the offence U/S. 17 1(E) of IPC is registered against the petitioners and the investigation is done without permission of the Magistrate and said offence is not unsustainable. Without permission of the Magistrate. conducting investigation is Illegal.
3
Investigation Is enclosed. Thecontentionraisedbecomes Is a factual defence and it Is amatter of evidence.
Accordingly, criminal petitionIsdismissed.
Sd! JUDGE
Srt
U/K. Salpatti
Addi'tional SPP
One Judge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
