High Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC challenging a maintenance award of Rs. 1,500 per month. The court held that no interim order required interference as the lower court had already passed a final order.
Criminal petition and prayer for interim maintenance order were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
1)ATI-D THIS I HI- 6114 DAY OF ii SE, 2012
I3LIORI
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SUBHASH B.ADI
CRIMINAl PI-TITION SO 120 2012
BETWEEN.
5/0. AZEEZ BAIG, ZABEER BAIG, AGED 36 YEARS, RIO. BHONABAGHATTA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI.
PETITIONER
(By Sri. B. S. PRASAD, ADV.)
AND:
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, SMT NAJIYA ANJUM, RIO. BRONABAGHATTA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK WIO ZABEER BAIG,
RESPANflflI
R P F ASPI) THY CT SR ‘Th) 4\D JMF( AT BH4DR4%Affl 50 22009 PASSED B I F IC N) )RDFR DAFD 26 DA1ED.02.09.2OIO PASSED BI THF P0 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1971 PRAYiNG THAT THIS HON’BI E QUASH ORDER Bk THIS CRIMINAL PETITION P11 FD I’S. 482 OF THF CODE RP NO AIsD OURT BTIADR4VATH IN THE MAY
OFFICE OBJECTIONS:
CRL.MISC.15/08 TO BE FILED
This petition coming on for orders, this day, the Courtmade the following:
ORDER
Petitioner has called in question he order dt 9 0 passed in Cr.R.P.No 25.09 on the file of the Fast Track Courta..Bhadravathi,
confirming the order dt. 26-9-09 passed in Cr.Misc.1512008onthe file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and JMFC Bhadravatlf
spon to ce S’.t 2c rf (r PC trial C’! ut t..ops’d.... .g tnt e’ ide ‘n recnrr da yn
Inc r-,dercdf 0r pasmnt if îü 53’) p—r qwnti 1i7 4P t
3
petition was filed by the petitioner before the learned Sessions is liable to pay maintenance at the rate of Its. 1,500/- per month. maintenance to the respondent order of the learned Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) and held that the petitioner — wife, as against which, a revision Judge at Bhadravati. The learned Sessions Judge also confirmed the
It is not in dispute that the respondent is the wife and she subject to result of the main matter. Cr1. P. is dismissed. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a coolie. Rather, it is on the lower side. Having regard to the same, there are has no other means. Maintenance awarded is not on the higher side. no rounds to interfere and the interim maintenance of Rs.l,5001- is 3.
JUDGE Sej/e
mgn/
Azeez Baig
Najiya Anjum
Subhash B. Adi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
