The Criminal Petition filed to quash FIR and complaint and take cognizance under Section 321 CrPC was dismissed for being not pressed by the petitioner during interim hearing leading to final disposition under Section 482 CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
C.
S
CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DATED THIS THE 14Th DAY OF JUNE 2012
BEFORE
THE FIONL3LE MR.J USTIC E K. SREEDHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.15141i2011
13E’flVEEN
RIO :# 9-12-661. 0CC: MEDiCAL PRACTITIONER. AGE ABOUT 41 YEARS RAJKL’MAR 5/0 CI IANI)RAPAL GAD VIDYANAGAR COLONY. H1DAR
PETITIONER
SRI SANJEEV PATIL. ADVS.) (BY SRI K M GHATE &
AN I)
THROUGH SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE MARKET POLICE STATION I. Ti LE S’IVrE OF KARNATAKA 13TDAR
RIO # 9-12-661, VIDYANAGAR, 0CC: I3USINESS, AGE ABOUT 70 YEARS COLONY BIDAR 2. Cl LANI)RA PAL S/O MANIKAYY, fl:\DA
RESPONDENTS
SRi I1VfHRAYAIANM SIN i)iIOL, ADV. FOR R2 (NOC OBTAINED) (BY SRI SUB1IASII MAI.LAPLJR. IICGP FOR Hi
Ii V
11115 CRI.P FiLE!) U/S. 482 OF CLLP.C BY TIlE AI)VOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYINGTHAT‘ri 115 IION’BLE COURT MAY 13K PLEASED ‘ro.PASSANORI)ER QUASHING THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO. 16/2011 ON ThE FILE OF ThE II ADDL. J.M.F.C.-IIAT BIDAR ON ThE BASIS OF COMPLAINT FILEI) BY RESPONDENT NO.2 AND TAKING COGNIZANCEAGAiNST THE PETI’I’IONER FOR TilE OFFENCE P/U/S. 420 OFIPC is ITIIOUFT JURISDICTION AND ALLOW THE ABOVE PETITION. IN TI IE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY
fillS Ib’TITiON COMING ON FOR F’INAI. HEARING TillS DAY. TI IF: COURT MAI)E THE FOLLOViNG:
ORDER
The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition he dismissed as not pressed. Accordingly. the
petition is dismissed flS Hot pressed.
Sd/ JUDGE
Sn
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajukumar
Vidyana Rao
K. Sreedhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
