Ramesh S/O Chandappa Jiggajinagi v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
null
What did the court decide?
null
null
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CcrBw4c (rULAIG IN THE HIGH COURT OP KARNATAKA A
bA\ Of .11 NE ‘:(‘i2 JiLT oRE 1)_fE1)j1-flS “HF I •,
I’) I ‘tilL f,IF1 ‘tk
Q1UMINA& PTI7IQNJ4Q. WQ9L2P 112
‘iJ$ EL’
‘ VV. .th ‘S EAFtS ar e I’ I ( O( (‘ MEMBER (fl PARL I MEYJ V rUN c ILS \lER r.V%K j I ‘IT fl.L ‘ Bi.L-M LR I 4 ‘1(1 h€ t 53 1 ‘t J ‘ t
PL:nIONrfl
3 SE ‘t I. A
5i I n- , . I T_N vi •ic 1.j—./ r :t IL’ ‘ ‘
I
) 1 :1; -
01 DElI
C r&k at. e I ii 1 t c.,hi ’t V. I .t I’ V ‘1 its,) I., Ir $ ‘- I • I I
3
Such endorsement would imply the permission to investigate the case. In that view, petition Is dismissed.
Hence, Petition Is dismissed.
JUDGE Sd!
‘BC
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Q1UMINA& PTI7IQNJ4Q
WFRALES
JUDGE Sd!
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court