the information, respondent no.3 filed the second appeal before the State Information Commission. He next submits that the petitioner took all efforts to attend the proceeding before the learned State Information Commission, directly or through its representative on 15.12.2008. It has been ensured that if the information is not provided, that will be provided. He further submits that due to some unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner was not present before the State Information Commission on 28.11.2008 and on that day itself, the said order was passed whereby the compensation as well as the penalty has been imposed upon the petitioner. He next submits that the said order has been passed in absence of providing any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and on 09.2.2009, the final order was passed against the petitioner for not providing the information to the satisfaction of the information seeker. He next submits that there is no reason provided as to how the information provided by the petitioner was not satisfactory, and in a cryptic manner, the punishment order has been passed.
