Dismissed¶15

Amarjeet Singh v. State of Jharkhand

Anticipatory bail – second/repeat application

Jharkhand HC15 Apr 2026A.B.A./1613/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi; A.B.A. No. 1613 of 2026; petitioner Amarjeet Singh; second anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of fresh ground; earlier A.B.A. No. 5449 of 2025 rejected on merits; Kanke P.S. Case No. 128 of 2025; offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi; decided 15.04.2026.

What did the court decide?

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner had already been rejected earlier in A.B.A. No. 5449 of 2025 on merits, and nothing new was argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner to entertain the second anticipatory bail application. ¶14

Amarjeet Singh Vs State of Jharkhand — Cheating and Forgery | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:JHHC:10692]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1613 of 2026

¶3

Amarjeet Singh, Son of Tejnarayan Singh, aged about 35 years, Resident of Gayatri Nagar, Sector-2, H.E.C Colony, P.O-Karma, P.S - Dhurwa, District - Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶4

..... … Petitioner

¶5

Versus The State of Jharkhand. ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI -----For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhinav Raj, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. ------

¶6

The State of Jharkhand.

¶7

05/ 15.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned P.P for

¶8

the State.

¶9

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No. 128 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi.

¶10

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has earlier moved before this court in A.B.A. No. 5449 of 2025, which was dismissed by this court. He next submits that several other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail in this case and further several cases have been lodged by the informant against the petitioner. He further submits that fresh ground is there, in view of that the second anticipatory bail application has been filed.

¶11

Learned P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the said A.B.A. was decided on merits considering the entire facts and there is no fresh ground to entertain the second anticipatory bail application.

¶12

-1-

¶13

[2026:JHHC:10692]

¶14

Considering that the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner has already been rejected earlier in A.B.A. No. 5449 of 2025 on merits and nothing new has been argued before this court by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to entertain second anticipatory bail application.

¶15

In view of the above, no fresh ground is made out to entertain this anticipatory bail application. As such, this petition is dismissed.

¶16

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

¶17

Dated:-15.04.2026 Amitesh/-

¶18

-2-

Amarjeet Singh v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amarjeet Singh v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Vijay Prasad Mala Vs the State of Jharkhand

Deepak Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kalpana Mandal Alias Kalpana Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sikandra Kumar Yadav @ Sikandra Kumar Vs State of Jharkhand

Sujeet Kumar Singh Alias Sujeet Kumar Alias Kujeet Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bali Mohuli and Ors. Vs Sudhir Mohuli and Ors.