Dismissed¶21

Anita Singh and Ors. v. Chief Secretory

Jharkhand HC21 Apr 2026WPC/1548/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand High Court W.P.(C) 1548/2013; Anita Singh and others v State of Jharkhand; land acquisition; Article 226 Constitution of India; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appeal; counsel Jitesh Kumar (petitions) and Shalini Shahdeo (State); single-judge bench Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi; decision date 21.04.2026; procedural withdrawal, no substantive ruling or precedent engagement.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioners to file an appeal. ¶21

Anita Singh and Ors. Vs Chief Secretory — Land Acquisition | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

( 2026:JHHC:11541 )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

W.P. (C) No. 1548 of 2013

¶4

Anita Singh, wife of Shailendra Singh

¶5

2(i) Abhinay Kumar, son of Late Shailendra Singh, Resident of Road No.4, Jawahar Nagar, Mango, P.O. & P.S. Mango, Dist.- East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur

¶6

Sidhesh Singh, son of Late Balan Singh

¶7

Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 are residents of Road No.4, Jawahar Nagar, Mango, P.O. & P.S. Mango, Town Jamshedpur, Dist.- East Singhbhum

¶8

1. Shamim Akhtar, son of Md. Siddique 5. Gulteshan Anjum, wife of Shamim Akhtar 6. Shamnam Parween, wife of Jawed Iqubal

¶9

Meena Singh, wife of Disdhesh Singh

¶10

Petitioner Nos. 4 to 7 are residents of Road No.6, P.O. Azad Nagar, Mango, P.S. Mango, Dist.- East Singhbhum

¶11

8(i) Sarosh Iqbal, son of Late Md. Jawed Iqbal, resident of Road No.15, Zakir Nagar West, P.O. & P.S. Azad Nagar, Mango, Dist. East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur … Petitioners

¶12

-Versus-

¶13

State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand

¶14

Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand

¶15

District Land Acquisition Officer, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand … Respondents

¶16

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

¶17

For the Petitioners : Mr. Jitesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Shalini Shahdeo, A.C. to S.C. (L&C)-I

¶18

13/21.04.2026 This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India relating to Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

¶19

Mr. Jitesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that remedy of appeal is there and in view of that, he seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file an appeal.

¶20

Mrs. Shalini Shahdeo, learned counsel for the State has got no objection.

¶21

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶22

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

¶23

Dated: 21^st April, 2026 Ajay/

Anita Singh and Ors. v. Chief Secretory

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anita Singh and Ors. v. Chief Secretory

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kartik Mahtha Vs State of Jharkhand

Sushanti Orain Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ashok Kumar Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kheman Das Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kajal Ansari Alias Kamruddin Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rajesh Kumar Sinha Alias Rajesh Sinha Vs the State of Jharkhand