Dismissed¶22

Sanjay Kumar Verma v. the State of Jharkhand through Its Chief Secretary

Jharkhand HC2 Apr 2026C.Rev./97/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand High Court, Civil Review No. 97 of 2025, dismissed by Deepak Roshan, J. on 02.04.2026. Review of order dated 11.06.2025 in W.P.(S) No. 6637 of 2018; grievance concerned non-consideration of 2nd ACP benefit under paragraph no.17 of the Resolution. Court held the order contains a finding and directed an aggrieved petitioner to the appellate Court; pending I.As disposed. Respondents include State of Jharkhand, Rural Development Department, Directorate Panchayati Raj, and Zila Parishad Gumla officials.

What did the court decide?

On going through the order dated 11.06.2025 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6637 of 2018, the Court found that a finding is given in the order, and that if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may challenge the order. ¶18

Sanjay Kumar Verma Vs the State of Jharkhand through Its Chief Secretary — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:JHHC:9489

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

Civil Review No. 97 of 2025

¶4

Sanjay Kumar Verma, aged about 59 years, S/o late Sudarshan Ram Verma Present Residence at Behind Birsa Munda Agro Park, Laxman Nagar Gumla, PO & PS-Gumla, District-Gumla

¶5

Earlier R/o Deputy Commissioner, Residence Road, Gumla, PO and PSGumla, Dist.-Gumla ... … Petitioner(s)

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, having its office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, PO and PS-Dhurwa, District Ranchi

¶8

The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, PO and PS Dhurwa

¶9

The Director, Directorate, Panchayati Raj Government of Jharkhand, having its office F.F.P Building, Dhurwa, PO and PS-Dhurwa, District Ranchi

¶10

District Development Commissioner cum Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Gumla, PO and PS-Gumla, District Gumla

¶11

Adhyach, Zila Parishad, Gumla, Gumla, PO and PS-Gumla, District Gumla

¶12

The Secretary, Zila Parishad, Gumla, Gumla, PO and PS Gumla, District Gumla ... … Respondent(s)

¶13

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sidhartha Roy, Advocate For Opposite Party(s) : Mr. J.F. Toppo, GA-V Mr. Neil Abhijit Toppo, AC to GA-V --------

¶15

Order No. 03 /Dated: 2^nd April 2026

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the review petitioner.

¶17

While referring to paragraph no.5 of the order dated 11.06.2025 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6637 of 2018 learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that as per paragraph no.17 of the Resolution the petitioner is entitled for the 2^nd ACP benefit, however, the same has not been considered by this Court.

¶18

After going through the order dated 11.06.2025 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6637 of 2018 it appears that there is a finding given in the order as such if the petitioner is aggrieved, he may challenge the order

¶19

¶20

2026:JHHC:9489

¶21

before the appellate Court.

¶22