Monika Ekka v. The State Of Jharkhand And Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Miscellaneous appeal (M.A. No. 63 of 2017, neutral citation 2026:JHHC:2910), High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi, Single Bench of Justice Rajesh Kumar, decided 04.02.2026. Appeal dismissed for want of instructions because the appellant (Monika Ekka) was untraceable and unresponsive to her counsel (Rishav Raj, Advocate); substituted service of notice had been ordered in 2022. Respondents: State of Jharkhand, Polus Ekka, Lajrus Ekka, Marium Ekka (counsel: Amitesh Kr. Geasen, AC to AAG-IA); proforma respondent: General Public of Village Tati, Ranchi. Relevant only on practice and procedure (dismissal for want of instructions); no statutory provisions or case law considered, no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
The present appeal is dismissed for want of instruction. ¶14