Dismissed¶13
Pushpa Devi Alias Pushpa Singh v. the State of Jharkhand
Jharkhand HCCr.M.P./1610/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Dismissal for non-prosecution; petitioners' absence despite repeated calls; no counsel for petitioners ('For the Petitioner s : None'); Addl. P.P. submission of lack of diligence and lack of merit; Jharkhand High Court at Ranchi; Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.; Cr.M.P. No. 1610 of 2019; Order No.14 dated 11.06.2026; neutral citation 2026:JHHC:16917; Pushpa Devi @ Pushpa Singh v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. No statute or precedent discussed; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
As no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite repeated calls, and the learned Addl. P.P. submitted that the petitioners were not diligent and the petition had no merit, the criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶13