Disposed¶20

Kantu Kumar Thakur v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC16 Jun 2026Cont.(Cvl)/1217/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand HC contempt case closed as complied: Kantu Kumar Thakur v. State of Jharkhand & CMPDI officials (Manoj Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Sanjay Kadambar); non-compliance alleged of order dt. 15.07.2025 in L.P.A No.541 of 2024; petitioner withdrew contempt claim after grievance redressed; Contempt Case (Cvl.) No.1217 of 2025 disposed 16.06.2026; advocates Harsh Vardhan (petitioner), Amit Kumar Das (CMPDI), Krishna Prajapati (State); bench Sujit Narayan Prasad & Sanjay Prasad, JJ.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed and disposed of upon acknowledgment that the order dated 15.07.2025 in L.P.A No.541 of 2024 had been complied with; pending I.As disposed of. ¶20

Kantu Kumar Thakur Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:JHHC:17409-DB

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

Contempt Case (Cvl.) No.1217 of 2025

¶4

-----

¶5

Kantu Kumar Thakur, aged about 29 years, son of Late Shiv Narayan Thakur, resident of Village - Benti, P.O. Behera, P.S. Piparwar, District – Chatra ....... …Writ Petitioner/Appellant/Petitioner Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand

¶7

Shri Manoj Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, Chairman, Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. Through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, having its office at Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District -Ranchi.

¶8

Shri Ajay Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner, The Director (P & A1), Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. Having its office at Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District – Ranchi.

¶9

Shri Sanjay Kadambar, Son of not known to the petitioner, The General Manager (P &A1), Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Ltd. having its office at Gondwana Place, Kanke Road, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, District - Ranchi … … Opposite Parties/Contemnors

¶10

¶11

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

¶12

------For the Petitioner : Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Advocate For the OPs-CMPDI : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate For the State : Mr. Krishna Prajapati, AC to SC-V

¶13

¶14

Order No.03 / Dated: 16^th June 2026

¶15

The present contempt case has been preferred alleging willful and deliberate non-compliance of the order of this Court dated 15.07.2025 passed in L.P.A No.541 of 2024.

¶16

Mr. Harsh Vardhan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with and the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed and, as such, he does not want to press the instant contempt case.

¶17

Mr. Amit Kumar Das, the learned counsel appearing for the concerned opposite party has corroborated the said fact.

¶18

Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as by the learned counsel appearing for the concerned opposite party stating that the order of this Court has

¶19

2026:JHHC:17409-DB

¶20

already been complied with, this Contempt Case is closed and disposed of, as such.

¶21