Rizwan Ansari Alias MD Rijwan Ansari Vs State of Jharkhand

( 2026:JHHC:6723 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8175 of 2025

Rizwan Ansari @ Md. Rijwan Ansari, aged about 27 years, s/o Wahab Ansari @ Bahab Ansari, r/o Village-Kalijot, P.O.+P.S.-Sarath, Dist.-Deoghar … Petitioner

¶3

Versus

¶4

The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶5

------

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶7

------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. ------

¶8

Order No.07 Dated- 13.03.2026

¶9

Heard the parties.

¶10

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.100 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 111(2) (b)/111(3)/ 111(4)/ 318(4)/ 319(2)/ 338/336(3)/ 340(2)/61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 66B/66C/66D/84C of I.T. Act.

¶11

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons was involved in commission of cybercrime and the mobile phone recovered from the petitioner was involved in creation of several e-wallets and was used for making series of calls. It is next submitted that the petitioner has defrauded one Arjun Prasad Singh of Rs.68,092/-. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.07.2025 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 22 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 22 of the bail application. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case and no witness has been examined in this case as yet. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that

¶12

he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

¶13

The learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

¶14

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.S.J.-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Deoghar, in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.100 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

¶15

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶16

13.03.2026 Gunjan-

Rizwan Ansari Alias MD Rijwan Ansari v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rizwan Ansari Alias MD Rijwan Ansari v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakhicharan Machhua Vs the State of Jharkhand

Altaf Sheikh Alias Altaf Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Balbir Paswan Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ajay Goyal Vs State of Jharkhand

Lakshmi Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bijay Kant Rout Vs the State of Jharkhand