Purushottam Kumar Yadav Alias Fakku Alias Purshottm Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Jharkhand High Court at Ranchi, B.A. No.5632 of 2026 ([2026:JHHC:20340]), decided 09.07.2026 by Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. Purushottam Kumar Yadav @ Fakku @ Purshottm Yadav v. The State of Jharkhand. Bail application under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) BNS 2023 arising from Sadar P.S. (Bara bazar O.P.) Case No.326 of 2025 / G.R. No.81 of 2026 — alleged theft of gold and silver jewellery and cash of Rs.37,000/-; accused not named in FIR, identified via CCTV footage, no Test Identification Parade; custody since 10.11.2025; Addl. P.P. opposed bail. Outcome: bail allowed — bond of Rs.25,000/- with two like sureties before learned C.J.M., Hazaribag, with conditions to co-operate with trial, furnish mobile number and Aadhar Card copy, not change mobile number, and not annoy or disturb witnesses. Advocates: Shailendra Jit for petitioner; Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl. P.P. for the State.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted: petitioner to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Hazaribag, subject to conditions of co-operating with the trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhar Card copy with an undertaking not to change the mobile number, and not annoying or disturbing witnesses during the trial.